Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) – are you liable to pay?
07 August 2019 Written by James & George CollieAdditional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) – are you liable to pay?

The Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 2016 (containing Additional Dwelling Supplement or "ADS" provisions) came into effect on 1 April 2016, adding an additional cost to buyers who purchase an ‘additional’ dwelling at a price over £40,000. The tax on the total purchase price increased from 3% to 4% with effect from 25 January 2019. 

The tax now appears to have contributed to a decline in “buy to let” purchasers entering the market, certainly within the local Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire markets.

The following examples illustrate that whether ADS is payable is very much dependent on individual circumstances, and ADS applies in more situations than many of our clients may have been aware.

Example 1

Where you do not own any dwelling but your partner (spouse, civil partner or cohabitee) does then you may have been under the mistaken belief that since you do not own a dwelling yourself, the ADS does not apply to you and you can purchase your own buy-to-let flat. However under the rules of "deemed ownership" it is deemed that you and your partner are treated as one ‘economic unit’ and you will potentially be liable for the ADS on the purchase of a new property.

The Scottish Government has felt that this rule ensures that couples cannot complete simple transfers of title in order to purchase multiple properties without paying the ADS tax liability.

Example 2

Where you own multiple dwellings and are selling your main dwelling (your primary residence) and you are replacing this with a same day purchase of your new main dwelling then even though you own other properties you will not be due to pay the ADS because you are replacing your main dwelling.

However, under the same example, if it was not your main residence that you were selling but another property you owned (such as a property you had been letting out), then as you are not replacing your main residence you will therefore be liable for ADS.

An example would be where you owned multiple buy-to-let flats and were selling a dwelling that you had let out and were buying a new dwelling for any reason. ADS is liable on the purchase price because you will own multiple dwellings but will not be replacing your primary residence by selling your existing one and buying a new one.

On a similar note where you buy a new main dwelling and later (within 18 months) sell your main dwelling (therefore replacing your main residence) you will have paid the ADS up-front on your purchase but are entitled to claim the ADS back. If you are however not replacing your main residence and are just selling a buy to let property then you are unable to claim the tax back later.

If you sold your main residence in the last 18 months and are buying a new main residence in replacement of your main residence within that 18 months you will not be liable for ADS.

Example 3

Another similar example might be where you own a buy-to-let flat but your main or primary residence is currently a different property that you are yourself leasing – then under these circumstances if you wish to continue to own your property that you are leasing out and also look to buy a new property then you will be liable for ADS as you will own multiple dwellings and will not be replacing a main residence. You will not be entitled to claim the ADS back even if you sell within 18 months your buy-to-let flat.

Example 4

Where a company is purchasing its first dwelling it will always be liable for ADS. It is probably unsurprising that the Scottish Government has blocked such an obvious way of avoiding or mitigating ADS.

Example 5

Where you own a house which is your main residence and you buy a piece of land then if that land has planning permission for a residential dwelling but no building work has commenced nor does it have any existing structures on it then you will not be liable to pay ADS on this purchase as the land you are buying will not be considered as a dwelling. Although you intend to build a dwelling on it, the use of the property at the effective date of the transaction overrides any past or intended future uses.

However the land may be considered as a dwelling if at the effective date there exists a structure or building already on it (even if you intend to substantially refurbish or demolish it), a dwelling is currently being built on it, or if a contract exists for a builder to construct a dwelling on it i.e. an off-plan property.

Example 6

Where you are selling your own main residence and replacing this with a new main residence, and for the purposes of this example, let us assume that you are very wealthy, and in addition to the large mansion you are purchasing you are also acquiring, as part of the deal, a "gate house". You will be liable to pay ADS on the part of the purchase price that is attributable to the "gate house" as this part is considered to be an additional dwelling.

These examples are not exhaustive and as you can see from some of the examples above, whether you are liable for ADS is very much dependent on your particular circumstances. Therefore, should you believe that you are potentially affected by the additional dwelling supplement you should take individualised legal advice and this article should not be relied upon or construed as providing legal advice. Should you require any legal advice regarding any of the issues raised in this article, or should you wish to discuss your next purchase, please contact Mark Allan by email or by telephone 01224 087201. Alternatively, please complete our online contact form.

get in touch

Please let us know your name.
Please enter a valid phone number
Please let us know your email address.
Invalid Input
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input